TruthSeeker, Information Warrior and Messenger – Alternative News and Spiritual Messages For Anyone Who Wants To Wake Up! No More Hidden Truths and Lies! Full Disclosure! Time to Wake Up! Everything will be up to the surface to be cleared away and the New Time begins for Humanity the Golden Age. Abundance, Prosperity, Freedom, Peace and Equality. Please take in what resonates and throw out what does not. Always use your own discernment with all information. Love and Light to you all Brothers and Sisters! The Truth Shall Set You Free! We are All ONE :-) NOTE: This blog may contain reading & images with offensive/shocking information.
(Prepare For Change) In 2015, France joined a growing list of countries which have banned or restricted potentially harmful radio-frequency radiation (RF-EMF) from schools, nurseries, and other locations where the most vulnerable people in society inhabit. According to the Environmental Health Trust (EHT), France has banned WiFi in “the spaces dedicated to home, to rest and activities of children under 3 years.” The country also required that telecom companies provide equipment that reduces exposure to RF-EMF for individuals under 14 years. →
While smaller cities have effectively blocked 5G technology, San Francisco has thrown its hat into the ring citing health concerns from radiation.
As 5G technology begins to roll out across the country, it is being met by a massive wave of resistance over concerns that it can cause health problems. As we reported last year—reacting to an overwhelming outpouring of concern—the city of Mill Valley, Cali. took an extreme step and blocked the technology from being implemented. Now that sentiment has spread to San Francisco and other major cities.
The thing is, it’s not just cell phone radiation, but rather a plethora of electromagnetic radiation that’s currently being beamed out by our cell towers, cell phones, computers, wireless routers etc. It’s a complete sandwich and not one safety study has addressed just how much electromagnetic radiation is currently present in our environment and what our current…..Read more & video: “Ramazzini Institute Study on Base Station Radiofrequency Radiation: Teleconference March 22, 2018”
By B.N. Frank EHTrust.org has many great articles, links, and videos about how exposure to all sources of cell phone and WiFi radiation can harm all parts of our bodies including breasts. In regard to breasts, Cellphones are two-way microwave radios that should not be kept directly on the body. The soft fatty tissue of…Read more & videos
By B.N. Frank These UK families have the right idea. They also aren’t the first to protest cell towers on school property: Parents, activists fight construction of cell phone towers at Prince George’s County schools (MD) Parents Object to Cell Phone Towers Near Schools (Chicago) Parents Fight Plans for Cell Tower at Virginia Elementary School…Read more & videos
Scientists call on the World Health Organization International Agency for Research on Cancer to re-evaluate the carcinogenicity of cell phone radiation after the Ramazzini Institute and US government studies report finding the same unusual cancers. I am posting this article with the permission of Environmental Health Trust and can be found online at ehtrust.org. (Washington, DC)…Read more & videos
(Natural News) Cell phone radiation is a big concern for many people, but manufacturers have largely downplayed the risks, and they’re quick to point out that their products meet the regulatory limits. That may be true, but what if the regulatory limits are inherently flawed?
Data released by France’s National Frequency Agency, ANFR, paints a very different picture of cell phone radiation danger. They found that nine out of ten popular phones that were found “compliant” in earlier lab tests were far above the legal limits when tested in ways that reflect how people actually use and carry their phones.
The original compliance tests entailed measuring the radiation that is absorbed by a test dummy filled with liquid, but this is done using a “separation distance.” When the agency re-tested popular phones from makers like Apple, Samsung, Nokia, and Motorola in the carry position most people use close to their body, they discovered that some had three times greater radiation than their original readings.
The Specific Absorption Rate, which measures how much radiation is absorbed by the body, was used in the tests. Right now, the U.S. and Canada allow an SAR of up to 1.6 watts per kilogram (W/kg), while the European Union’s limit is 2.0 W/kg. Unfortunately, in testing, manufacturers are allowed to use a separation distance of 15 millimeters between the device and the test dummy, which isn’t an accurate reflection of how most people carry their phones. Some of the biggest offenders in the test were the HISENSE SMART 5 at 6.14, the Apple iPhone 5 at 5.321, and the Motorola Motorlux at 5.86.