To date, there has only been one study conducted on remdesivir, the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) drug that Anthony Fauci wants you to take instead of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). And it just so happens that this one-and-only study does not actually prove the effectiveness of remdesivir.
It was beyond strange when the major media networks began to attack a pharmaceutical, especially in the middle of a pandemic.
When did the major media networks ever criticize a drug?
It turns out that controversial pharmaceutical is a cheap medicine that helps human cells uptake zinc so their immune system can recover from coronavirus infections.
(Natural News) As you may already know, The Lancet recently retracted a May 22 article it published claiming that the generic anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is ineffective against the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19). Not only were the claims made in this now-retracted paper false, but it turns out that the very same people who put it together were also busy publishing other studies pushing the anti-viral drug remdesivir as the preferable alternative to HCQ. →
By Ty Bollinger – July 14, 2020
Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority.”
– Sir John Dalberg-Acton
We all want to believe that we live in a fundamentally good world. A world in which our leaders serve the best interests of the greater good, in which our most wealthy and successful citizens and companies use their influence to help others, and where communities come together to support one another in times of crisis. A world where an organization like the CDC would actually act in the best interests of public health and individual well being.
Sadly, this simply isn’t the case.
Before we dive in, let’s recap a quick highlight reel of CDC corruption and the contentious cover ups by which it has been defined in recent years: →