Vaccinerna mot C19 skyddar inte mot infektioner och liknar smärtstillande hostmedicin | NewsVoice

NewsVoice – 27 November, 2020

FORSKNING. Moderna, Pfizer, AstraZeneca och Johnson & Johnson leder utvecklingen av vaccin mot Covid-19 (C-19). Forskningsprotokollen visar att effektiviteten är minimal och att målet endast är att mildra symptom som hosta och huvudvärk. Det mest anmärkningsvärda är att dessa vacciner inte ens skyddar mot infektion, enligt tidningen Forbes som undersökt forskningen.

Läs mer: Vaccinerna mot C19 skyddar inte mot infektioner och liknar smärtstillande hostmedicin — NewsVoice.se

Johnson Johnson’s aborted baby Covid-19 vaccine harms trial participant | NaturalNews.com

October 15, 2020 by: Ethan Huff

(Natural News) Things are going exceptionally poorly for Big Pharma in its quest to release “warp speed” vaccines for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19). The latest casualty is Johnson & Johnson, which halted its trial due to an “unexplained illness” in one of its participants.

Similar to what happened with AztraZeneca’s Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) vaccine trial, J&J observed a participant suffer from a serious adverse event, prompting the company to put an immediate stop to its Phase 3 operations.

Johnson & Johnson To Pay Over 100 Million To Settle 1000 Baby Powder Cancer Suits | Collective Evolution

Collective Evolution | By Arjun Walia – Oct 14, 2020

IN BRIEF

The Facts: Johnson & Johnson has agreed to pay more than $100 million to resolve over 1,000 lawsuits blaming its baby powder for causing cancer. There are still approximately 20,000 lawsuits that will remain ongoing.

Reflect On: How safe are our everyday off the shelf health products? What kins of process of approval do they go through? How much influence do these companies have on our federal health regulatory agencies?

What Happened:

Chronic Corruption Part I: A History of Incompetence | The Truth About Cancer – July 15, 2020

Chronic Corruption Part 1

The Truth About Cancer

By Ty Bollinger – July 14, 2020

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority.”

– Sir John Dalberg-Acton

We all want to believe that we live in a fundamentally good world. A world in which our leaders serve the best interests of the greater good, in which our most wealthy and successful citizens and companies use their influence to help others, and where communities come together to support one another in times of crisis. A world where an organization like the CDC would actually act in the best interests of public health and individual well being.

Sadly, this simply isn’t the case.

Before we dive in, let’s recap a quick highlight reel of CDC corruption and the contentious cover ups by which it has been defined in recent years: →

Read the Fine Print: Vaccine Package Inserts Reveal Hundreds of Medical Conditions Linked to Vaccines — Prepare For Change – June 11, 2020

(Prepare For Change)

By the Children’s Health Defense Team

In March 2015, Dr. Anthony Fauci—the career National Institutes of Health official elevated by the media to the status of COVID-19 Grand Poobah—told PBS’s Frontline with a straight face that risks from vaccines are “almost nonmeasurable.” Fauci then proceeded to downplay every potential vaccine risk proposed by the interviewer, stating that each had “no basis in reality.” Having served at the helm of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, Fauci surely was aware then, and is aware now, that the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program established in the late 1980s has paid out billions of dollars to the vaccine-injured: $4.3 billion as of April 1, 2020. Did Fauci feel that he could get away with making such dismissive statements because he knew about the Harvard study from 2010 showing that fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events get reported—and what isn’t reported can’t be measured? →

Johnson & Johnson Ends Baby Powder Sales In US & Canada After Lawsuits — Era of Light – May 20, 2020

(Era of Light)

Johnson & Johnson will halt all sales of its talc-based baby powder in North America, after years of lawsuits claiming the product causes cancer – but, undeterred, the firm says it won’t stop selling it to the rest of the world.

The company announced the move in a statement on Tuesday, noting that it had decided to “permanently discontinue” the baby powder in the US and Canada to “prioritize high-demand products” amid the Covid-19 pandemic, attributing the fall in sales in part to “misinformation.” ⇲

Johnson & Johnson Recalls 33,000 Baby Powder Bottles After FDA Finds Asbestos — Waking Times – October 24, 2019

Johnson & Johnson Recalls 33,000 Baby Powder Bottles After FDA Finds Asbestos

Jordan Davidson, EcoWatch
Waking Times

Pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson recalled 33,000 bottles of baby powder on Friday after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) found trace amounts of asbestos in one of its bottles. While the recall pertains to a single lot of baby powder, it is unwelcome news for the company, which faces thousands of lawsuits claiming that its talc-based baby powder caused cancer, as CBS News reported. →

Johnson & Johnson Ordered To Pay $572 Million For Fueling the Opioid Epidemic — The Free Thought Project – August 26, 2019

(The Free Thought Project) An Oklahoma judge ruled that Johnson & Johnson must pay a $572 million penalty for allegedly helping to fuel the opioid epidemic with irresponsible marketing practices. →

In Just One Decade, Corporations Destroyed 50 Million Hectares of Forest—An Area the Size of Spain — Waking Times – July 25, 2019

amazon rainforest

Jessica Corbett, Common Dreams
Waking Times

Major corporations involved with commodities like beef, palm oil, and soya pledged in 2010 to end deforestation over the next decade—but instead of fulfilling that promise, a new Greenpeace International analysis found the companies are set to destroy at least 50 million hectares of forest worldwide by 2020.

Is Corporate Bribery Determining Your Cancer Treatment? — The Truth About Cancer – May 31, 2019

(The Truth About Cancer)

Do incentives from Big Pharma influence the way doctors treat cancer patients? A study published earlier this year in JAMA Oncology says YES.

The first study to evaluate reimbursement policies and clinical care in oncology, the review found that oncologists often change their treatment recommendations and prescriptions based on incentives from the pharmaceutical industry.