By Mac Slavo A well-known Russian weapons company has just unveiled its newest deadly weapon: a golden 13-foot tall killer robot. Kalashnikov Concern presented the large bulletproof robot that’s currently in development at the Army 2018 fair near Moscow. About 1,200 Russian defense companies and weapon manufacturers take part in the Army 2018 event, according to reports by….Read more
- The Facts:Dr. Michel Chossudovsky, who is the University of Ottawa’s Emeritus Professor of Economics and has worked directly with governments on various geopolitical issues has spoken out against weather modification and the long history of its use.
- Reflect On:Why are we spraying things into our atmosphere without the people being aware of it? Why is it such a secretive issue? Should we not know about it? Why is this topic never brought up in the climate change discussion?
It wasn’t long ago when weather manipulation was a conspiracy theory. Fast forward to today and we have a recent CIA director going live at the Council on Foreign Relations announcing his support of Geo-engineering. If you didn’t already know, Geo-engineering is the spraying of particles (like heavy metals) into the atmosphere in order to deflect the sun’s light back away from Earth. The global elite is considering it as a measure to combat climate change, so they claim. It’s fishy because there is a great deal of evidence which suggests that spraying has been happening for decades, for what could be ulterior motives. Who knows what they are, but simple experimentation with weather manipulation might be the answer.
Princess Basmah Bint Saud, humanitarian and daughter of King Saudi, compared geoengineering science and programs to weapons of mass destruction, arguing that their implementation is like setting off a bomb without the nuclear explosion. You can read more about that here. David W. Keith, a professor at Harvard University and chairman of Carbon Engineering, when asked about the spraying of these heavy metals into the atmosphere, of which millions of tonnes would have to be used, he said:
“You may end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision.”
A United States government document printed at the request of the United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation in November of 1978 states:
“In addition to specific research programs sponsored by Federal agencies, there are other functions related to weather modification which are performed in several places in the executive branch. Various federal advisory panels and committees and their staffs – established to conduct in-depth studies and prepare comprehensive reports, to provide advice or recommendations, or to coordinate Federal weather modification programs – have been housed and supported within executive departments, agencies, or offices.”
There are countless documents and more on this, and we’ve been writing about it for a long time. We have multiple heavily sourced articles on our site about the topic of geoengineering and ‘chemtrails’ if you want to learn more.
This is why it comes as no surprise that prominent author and Canadian economist Dr. Michel Chossudovsky, who is the University of Ottawa’s Emeritus Professor of Economics and has worked directly with governments on various geopolitical issues, is one of many people from within academia who is and has been speaking out against the grain for a long time. He makes some great points in an article he wrote on his website:
The significant expansion in America’s weather warfare arsenal, which is a priority of the Department of Defense is not a matter for debate or discussion. While environmentalists blame the Bush administration for not having signed the Kyoto protocol, the issue of “weather warfare”, namely the manipulation of weather patterns for military use, is never mentioned.
The US Air Force has the capability to manipulate climate either for testing purposes or for outright military-intelligence use. These capabilities extend to the triggering of floods, hurricanes, droughts, and earthquakes.
Weather modification will become a part of domestic and international security and could be done unilaterally… It could have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for deterrence purposes. The ability to generate precipitation, fog, and storms on earth or to modify space weather, … and the production of artificial weather all are a part of an integrated set of technologies which can provide substantial increase in US, or degraded capability in an adversary, to achieve global awareness, reach, and power. (Air University of the US Air Force, AF 2025 Final Report, http://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/ . Emphasis added)
Multiple politicians have accused the US of using weather weapons, like Hugo Chaves and the Hati Earthquake, for example. You can read more about that here: Was Hugo Chavez Right About HAARP & The HAITI Earthquake? Is Weather Even Natural Anymore?
If we are talking about climate change, is that the real issue here? If so, why is this type of geo-engineering never mentioned in the debate? We’ve fiddled and messed around in our atmosphere so much, and its effects are potentially dangerous, yet it’s ignored. Climate change, like everything else, has become a political issue with greedy intentions behind its solution. The money always seems to come first, not the planet.
Dr. Rosalie Bertell, American scientist, author, environmental activist, epidemiologist, best known for her work in ionizing radiation, puts it quite well.
It is related to fifty years of intensive and increasingly destructive programs to understand and control the upper atmosphere. … HAARP is an integral part of a long history of space research and development of a deliberate military nature. The military implications of combining these projects is alarming. … The ability of the HAARP / Spacelab/ rocket combination to deliver very large amounts of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth via laser and particle beams, are frightening. The project is likely to be “sold” to the public as a space shield against incoming weapons, or, for the more gullible, a device for repairing the ozone layer.
Environmental modification has been happening for decades yet nobody knows about it, and that’s because the everyday dialogue is controlled by the mainstream media. What’s important is rarely discussed or even acknowledged. During the Vietnam war, cloud seeding was used to prolong the monsoon season.
Again from Choussovdusky:
The US military has developed advanced capabilities that enable it selectively to alter weather patterns. The technology, which was initially developed in the 1990s under the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), was an appendage of the Strategic Defense Initiative – ‘Star Wars’. From a military standpoint, HAARP –which was officially abolished in 2014– is a weapon of mass destruction, operating from the outer atmosphere and capable of destabilising agricultural and ecological systems around the world.
Remember, weather modification, according to the US Air Force document AF 2025 Final Report, “offers the war fighter a wide range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary”, capabilities, it says, extend to the triggering of floods, hurricanes, droughts, and earthquakes.
So, next time a discussion about global change comes up, perhaps you can mention geoengineering and weather modification with confidence, knowing that it’s far from a conspiracy theory.
Source: Collective Evolution
Credit: Operation Disclosure
Den 9 januari träningsflög en B-52N, strategisk bombplan, den här gången ej bestyckad med kärnvapen, över Östersjön så nära den Baltiska kusten och därmed ryska Kaliningrad, som möjligt. Den åtföljdes av flera plan, däribland American RC-135 drönare, AWACS British long-range spionplan men även svenska försvarets Gulfstream-4.
Samtidigt lämnade tre B-52H USA för att via England flyga vidare till Litauen för att utföra NATO-övningar. B-52H är USA:s viktigaste kärnvapenbärare.
Uppenbarligen gör man allt från US/NATO håll för att provocera Ryssland. Att man från svensk sida engagerar sig i detta och tar ställning visar bara att man inte är rädd om det egna landet utan blottar Sverige som ett strategiskt mål vid en konflikt.
Det här är inte den enda provokation mot Ryssland som USA kostar på sig. Natten 6 januari blev ryska militärbaser i Tartus och Khmeimim i Syrien utsatta för omfattande anfall från bestyckade drönare, som uppenbarligen kom från Israel och där deras navigering övervakades av en av USA:s Poseidon, som under flera timmar cirklade över området på 7000 meters höjd.
Ej att förglömma de omfattande provokationer som USA utför genom att förse bland annat den nazistiska Azov-bataljonen i Ukraina med kraftiga vapen avsedda att eskalera kriget i östra Ukraina och dra in Ryssland i detta.
Historiskt sett är detta inget nytt – ett signum för dårar är ju att de älskar att provocera. Men för Sverige har detta intill nu varit främmande. Vi kan bara hoppas på att Putin kan bevare sin tålmodighet och inte svara på de vettlösa provokationerna.
Fort Russ, South Front, New Eastern Outlook
Av: Hans Myrebro