The thing is, it’s not just cell phone radiation, but rather a plethora of electromagnetic radiation that’s currently being beamed out by our cell towers, cell phones, computers, wireless routers etc. It’s a complete sandwich and not one safety study has addressed just how much electromagnetic radiation is currently present in our environment and what our current…..Read more & video: “Ramazzini Institute Study on Base Station Radiofrequency Radiation: Teleconference March 22, 2018”
By B.N. Frank EHTrust.org has many great articles, links, and videos about how exposure to all sources of cell phone and WiFi radiation can harm all parts of our bodies including breasts. In regard to breasts, Cellphones are two-way microwave radios that should not be kept directly on the body. The soft fatty tissue of…Read more & videos
By B.N. Frank These UK families have the right idea. They also aren’t the first to protest cell towers on school property: Parents, activists fight construction of cell phone towers at Prince George’s County schools (MD) Parents Object to Cell Phone Towers Near Schools (Chicago) Parents Fight Plans for Cell Tower at Virginia Elementary School…Read more & videos
July 09, 2018 by: Isabelle Z.
(Natural News) Cell phone radiation is a big concern for many people, but manufacturers have largely downplayed the risks, and they’re quick to point out that their products meet the regulatory limits. That may be true, but what if the regulatory limits are inherently flawed?
Data released by France’s National Frequency Agency, ANFR, paints a very different picture of cell phone radiation danger. They found that nine out of ten popular phones that were found “compliant” in earlier lab tests were far above the legal limits when tested in ways that reflect how people actually use and carry their phones.
The original compliance tests entailed measuring the radiation that is absorbed by a test dummy filled with liquid, but this is done using a “separation distance.” When the agency re-tested popular phones from makers like Apple, Samsung, Nokia, and Motorola in the carry position most people use close to their body, they discovered that some had three times greater radiation than their original readings.
The Specific Absorption Rate, which measures how much radiation is absorbed by the body, was used in the tests. Right now, the U.S. and Canada allow an SAR of up to 1.6 watts per kilogram (W/kg), while the European Union’s limit is 2.0 W/kg. Unfortunately, in testing, manufacturers are allowed to use a separation distance of 15 millimeters between the device and the test dummy, which isn’t an accurate reflection of how most people carry their phones. Some of the biggest offenders in the test were the HISENSE SMART 5 at 6.14, the Apple iPhone 5 at 5.321, and the Motorola Motorlux at 5.86.
Read more at: Natural News
Technology, especially microwave-produced radiofrequencies that will operate in the millimeter wave ranges—possibly above 6 GHz (Gigahertz: one GHz is one BILLION frequency oscillations per SECOND), experiences serious consumer opposition being undertaken, and publicly demonstrated, in numerous cities in various countries in Europe. One of the colleagues I network with emailed a detailed synopsis of what’s….Read more
By B.N. Frank Cell phone manufacturers have actually been warning their shareholders – not customers – that they may eventually be held liable for the harm they have caused. In the meantime though, they want to keep the rest of us confused about harm from exposure and excited about new digital, electronic, and wireless technology.…Read more & short video
There are thousands of peer-reviewed studies that have come out, and continue to come out, raising some alarming facts about our favourite gadgets such as cell phones, tablets, our use of Wi-Fi (Wi-Fi radiation) and more. But the main focus lately seems to be on WiFi and cell phones, as a number of countries around….Read more