Alternative News and Spiritual/Channeled Messages: All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. – Arthur Schopenhauer. If you want to change the World for the better begin with Yourself /TheLightHasWon
In 2019, telecom executives gave U.S. congressional testimony that they have NO scientific evidence that 5G is safe. This is one of many reasons why American opposition to 5G continues to increase.
State representatives in Hawaii have introduced a bill to ban deployment until studies show that it’s safe. Hawaii County Commissioners introduced a resolution to ban it for the same reasons and it has now been passed. →
There was a time when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was supposed to warn Americans about biological and environmental risks from exposure to cell phones and other wireless radiation emitting devices and infrastructure. Unfortunately, the agency was relieved of this duty when they actually wanted to start warning the public about it. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) – not a health or environmental agency – took the EPA’s place and has failed miserably to protect the public from the telecom industry ever since (see 1, 2). →
(Collective Evolution) 5G technology has been making a lot of noise lately, and it’s surrounded by controversy. It’s unfortunate when claims made about the safety of 5G technology, and wireless technology in general are done so without any supporting evidence because it simply furthers the idea that there are no safety concerns when it comes its potential impact on human health. There seems to be a lingering idea out there that 5G technology is completely safe and poses no threat to human health, and any information that does suggest and provide evidence for the claim seems to be constantly brushed off by the mainstream media. For example, an article written in Forbes states “Fortunately, science already tells us that 5G almost certainly poses no danger to humans. Unless you value unfounded conspiracies over bona fide science.” This is a confusing statement, and in the eyes of many it seems to be false because there are countless amounts of doctors and scientists who have been publishing peer-reviewed science regarding the potential health impacts of 5G technology, as well as the wireless technology currently employed that predates 5G. →
Read more & trailer: “5G Crisis: Awareness & Accountability Summit [TRAILER]” (4:06) via — Collective Evolution
(Prepare For Change) In 2015, France joined a growing list of countries which have banned or restricted potentially harmful radio-frequency radiation (RF-EMF) from schools, nurseries, and other locations where the most vulnerable people in society inhabit. According to the Environmental Health Trust (EHT), France has banned WiFi in “the spaces dedicated to home, to rest and activities of children under 3 years.” The country also required that telecom companies provide equipment that reduces exposure to RF-EMF for individuals under 14 years. →
(NaturalHealth365) With the number of global cell phone users currently at over 2.7 billion, humanity (and the environment) is being bombarded by unprecedented amounts of cell phone radiation. In addition to emissions from cell phones, we are exposed to radiation from cell phone towers, wireless networks, laptops, routers and “smart” meters. →
(ACTIVIST POST) Thanks toFrank Cleggand Michigan Safe Technology for posting this short but information-packed video. In February, telecom executives gave congressional testimony that they haveno scientific evidence that 5G is safe. Warnings about widespread 5G installation and exposure have been cited by many experts and for a variety of valid reasons: →
The conversation about 5G within the mainstream is becoming quite concerning for onlookers, as there’s been an increase in awareness about the health concerns of wireless radiation. Sure, there are natural sources of electromagnetic radiation on both ends of the spectrum in our environment, but never before has humanity experienced this much. The main reason why this is so concerning is because “Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period. This is no longer a subject for debate when you look at PubMed and the peer-review literature. These effects are seen in all life forms; plants, animals, insects, microbes. In humans, we have clear evidence of cancer now: there is no question We have evidence of DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, which is the precursor of congestive heart failure, neuropsychiatric effects.” (Dr. Sharon Goldberg, 5G Small Cell Tower Hearing In Michigan)
In July, the government concluded an agreement with three telecom operators to relax the strict radiation standards in Brussels. But according to the Region, it is now impossible to estimate the radiation from the antennas required for the service.
“I cannot welcome such technology if the radiation standards, which must protect the citizen, are not respected, 5G or not,” Environment minister Céline Fremault (CDH) told Bruzz. “The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit. We cannot leave anything to doubt,” she added.