There was a time when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was supposed to warn Americans about biological and environmental risks from exposure to cell phones and other wireless radiation emitting devices and infrastructure. Unfortunately, the agency was relieved of this duty when they actually wanted to start warning the public about it. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) – not a health or environmental agency – took the EPA’s place and has failed miserably to protect the public from the telecom industry ever since (see 1, 2). →
(Collective Evolution) 5G technology has been making a lot of noise lately, and it’s surrounded by controversy. It’s unfortunate when claims made about the safety of 5G technology, and wireless technology in general are done so without any supporting evidence because it simply furthers the idea that there are no safety concerns when it comes its potential impact on human health. There seems to be a lingering idea out there that 5G technology is completely safe and poses no threat to human health, and any information that does suggest and provide evidence for the claim seems to be constantly brushed off by the mainstream media. For example, an article written in Forbes states “Fortunately, science already tells us that 5G almost certainly poses no danger to humans. Unless you value unfounded conspiracies over bona fide science.” This is a confusing statement, and in the eyes of many it seems to be false because there are countless amounts of doctors and scientists who have been publishing peer-reviewed science regarding the potential health impacts of 5G technology, as well as the wireless technology currently employed that predates 5G. →
Read more & trailer: “5G Crisis: Awareness & Accountability Summit [TRAILER]” (4:06) via — Collective Evolution
By Phillip Schneider,
(Prepare For Change) In 2015, France joined a growing list of countries which have banned or restricted potentially harmful radio-frequency radiation (RF-EMF) from schools, nurseries, and other locations where the most vulnerable people in society inhabit. According to the Environmental Health Trust (EHT), France has banned WiFi in “the spaces dedicated to home, to rest and activities of children under 3 years.” The country also required that telecom companies provide equipment that reduces exposure to RF-EMF for individuals under 14 years. →
(NaturalHealth365) With the number of global cell phone users currently at over 2.7 billion, humanity (and the environment) is being bombarded by unprecedented amounts of cell phone radiation. In addition to emissions from cell phones, we are exposed to radiation from cell phone towers, wireless networks, laptops, routers and “smart” meters. →
By B.N. Frank
(ACTIVIST POST) Thanks to Frank Clegg and Michigan Safe Technology for posting this short but information-packed video. In February, telecom executives gave congressional testimony that they have no scientific evidence that 5G is safe. Warnings about widespread 5G installation and exposure have been cited by many experts and for a variety of valid reasons: →
By B.N. Frank
Last month, Activist Post also reported about 5G opposition in Switzerland. It’s only increasing.
Simmering opposition to the rollout of 5G technology in Switzerland climbed a notch on Friday as a 1,000-strong protest was held in the capital, Bern.
Putting in tens of millions of 5G antennae without a single biological test of safety has got to be about the stupidest idea anyone has had in the history of the world” – Martin L. Pall, PhD & Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University. – 5G: Great risk for EU, U.S. and International Health! Compelling Evidence for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field(EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them.
The conversation about 5G within the mainstream is becoming quite concerning for onlookers, as there’s been an increase in awareness about the health concerns of wireless radiation. Sure, there are natural sources of electromagnetic radiation on both ends of the spectrum in our environment, but never before has humanity experienced this much. The main reason why this is so concerning is because “Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period. This is no longer a subject for debate when you look at PubMed and the peer-review literature. These effects are seen in all life forms; plants, animals, insects, microbes. In humans, we have clear evidence of cancer now: there is no question We have evidence of DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, which is the precursor of congestive heart failure, neuropsychiatric effects.” (Dr. Sharon Goldberg, 5G Small Cell Tower Hearing In Michigan)
Read more & videos: “President, Los Angeles County Firefighter’s Union, Local 1014, Opposes Cell Towers” (3:16) and “ConsumerWatch: 5G Cellphone Towers Signal Renewed Concerns Over Impacts on Health” (4:52) via Watch: Firefighters Report Neurological Damage After Cell Tower Installation Near Their Station — Collective Evolution
By B.N. Frank
According to the Brussels Times
In July, the government concluded an agreement with three telecom operators to relax the strict radiation standards in Brussels. But according to the Region, it is now impossible to estimate the radiation from the antennas required for the service.
“I cannot welcome such technology if the radiation standards, which must protect the citizen, are not respected, 5G or not,” Environment minister Céline Fremault (CDH) told Bruzz. “The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit. We cannot leave anything to doubt,” she added.
Read more & videos via Due to Health Concerns, Brussels Stops 5G Installation — For Now —
By B.N. Frank
There seems to be no shortage of people in the U.S. and around the world protesting cell towers on school property. It’s hard to blame them considering there is still no “safe” level of wireless radiation exposure that has been scientifically determined for children or pregnant women.
By B.N. Frank
This new article from Dr. Mercola is more than a huge wake-up call for those who haven’t read the safety warnings in their cellphone manuals. It also confirms that even those who do follow federal “safety” guidelines are NOT truly safe from harmful radiation. This is because safety levels are based on outdated Standard Absorption Rate (SAR) testing which has always been VERY flawed. Not only that – there’s already beaucoup research that has proven harm from exposure:
Read more & video: “We Don’t Have Plastic Heads” (4:48) : New Article by Dr. Mercola Reminds Us to Read Safety Warnings Hidden Inside Cellphones As Well As Research on Exposure —